Beyond Beneficence: Moral Asymmetry and the Minimization of Suffering in End-of-Life Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7202/1124210arKeywords:
end-of-life care, compassion, consequentialism, moral asymmetry, palliative careLanguage(s):
EnglishAbstract
This paper critically examines the ethical foundations for minimizing suffering at the end of life. The reduction of suffering is a major concern in the ethical discourse of end-of-life care. Some thinkers privilege minimizing unwanted and unnecessary suffering at the end of life as much as possible. And yet, many others consider minimizing suffering an insufficient or risky justification for decision-making at the end of life. The desire to minimize suffering is considered equivalent to or entirely contained within utilitarianism or, in bioethics, the principle of beneficence. Here, I argue that it is a mistake to ground the desire to minimize suffering at the end of life in utilitarianism or beneficence, since these are morally symmetrical, and the commitment to minimize suffering is morally asymmetrical. As an alternative, I propose and develop the doctrine of least avoidable suffering (DLAS), which is grounded in negative utilitarianism — aka morally asymmetrical consequentialism. I assess DLAS against a series of end-of-life treatments and demonstrate that it aligns well with the ethical commitments of those who desire to minimize suffering at the end of life. I conclude that DLAS offers people, institutions, and physicians a formal, systematized, and defensible theoretical basis for the desire to minimize suffering at the end of life.
References
1. Wolf C. O repugnance, where is thy sting? In: Tännsjö T, Ryberg J, editors. The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2004. p. 61-80.
2. Mayerfeld J. The moral asymmetry of happiness and suffering. Southern Journal of Philosophy. 1996;34(3):317-38.
3. Popper KR. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Ryan A, Gombrich EH, editors. Princeton: Routledge; 1945.
4. Häyry M. Exit duty generator. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2024;33(2):217-31.
5. Scarre G. Utilitarianism. New York: Routledge; 2020.
6. Smart JJC. Negative utilitarianism. In: D’Agostino F, Jarvie I, editors. Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honor of John Watkins From his Colleagues and Friends. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1989. p. 35-46.
7. Smart RN. Negative utilitarianism. Mind. 1958;67(268):542-43.
8. Krisman-Scott MA. Origins of hospice in the United States: The care of the dying, 1945–1975. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing. 2003;5(4):205-10.
9. Quill TE, Miller FG, editors. Palliative Care and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
10. Davies E, Higginson IJ. Better palliative care for older people. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2004.
11. Dy SM, Kiley KB, Ast K et al. Measuring what matters: Top-ranked quality indicators for hospice and palliative care from the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2015;49(4):773-81.
12. Hanks GW, editor. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
13. Cassell EJ. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. Loss, Grief & Care. 1998;8(1-2):129-42.
14. Varelius J. Suffering at the end of life. Bioethics. 2019;33(1):195-200.
15. Quill TE. Death and dignity. In: Battin MP, Francis LP, Landsman BM, eds. Death, Dying and the Ending of Life, Vol. I–II. London: Routledge; 2019. p. 245-48.
16. Rehnquist WH; Supreme Court of the United States. U.S. Reports: Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793. Washington, DC: U.S. Supreme Court; 1996.
17. Miller FG, Truog RD, Brock DW. Moral fictions and medical ethics. Bioethics. 2010;24(9):453-60.
18. Bronner B. Two ways to kill a patient. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2018;43(1):44-63.
19. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979/2001.
20. Greif A. The morality of euthanasia. Organon F. 2019;26(4):612-34.
21. Rigby B, Symons X. Abortion, euthanasia, and the limits of principlism. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2023;26(4):549-56.
22. Young R. Voluntary euthanasia. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2024 Edition; 2024.
23. Singer P. Voluntary euthanasia: A utilitarian perspective. Bioethics. 2003;17(5-6):526-41.
24. Kass L. Life, Liberty & the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. New York: Encounter Books; 2002.
25. van der Haak D. Death anxiety, immortality projects and happiness: A utilitarian argument against the legalization of euthanasia. Conatus – Journal of Philosophy. 2021;6(1):159-74.
26. Dworkin R. Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage; 2011.
27. Dyck AJ. Life’s Worth: The Case Against Assisted Suicide. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing; 2002.
28. Norcross A. Killing and letting die. In: Frey RG, Heath Wellman C, editors. A Companion to Applied Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. p. 451-63.
29. Mangan JT. An historical analysis of the principle of double effect. Theological Studies. 1949;10(1):41-61.
30. Bogatyńska-Kucharska A. The doctrine of double effect: A comparison of the version of Thomas Aquinas and contemporary accounts as formulated by Joseph Mangan and Joseph Boyle. Forum Philosophicum. 2020;25(2):273-92.
31. Harnad S. My orgasms cannot be traded off against others’ agony. Animal Sentience. 2016;1(7):18.
32. Hurka T. Asymmetries in value. Nous. 2010;44(2):199-223.
33. Mayerfeld J. Suffering and Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
34. Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
35. Wolf C. Person-affecting utilitarianism and population policy; or, Sissy Jupe’s theory of social choice. In: Fotion N, Heller JC, editors. Contingent Future Persons: On the Ethics of Deciding Who Will Live, or Not, in the Future. Dordrecht: Springer; 1997. p. 99-122.
36. Goetz JL, Keltner D, Simon-Thomas E. Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin. 2010;136(3):351-74.
37. Ord T. Why I’m not a negative utilitarian. Toby Ord. 28 Feb 2013.
38. Arrhenius G, Bykvist K. Future generations and interpersonal compensations. Uppsala Prints and Preprints in Philosophy; 1995.
39. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: A consensus statement by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Critical Care Medicine. 2008;36(3):953-63.
40. Quill TE, Ganzini L, Truog RD, Pope TM. Voluntarily stopping eating and drinking among patients with serious advanced illness—clinical, ethical, and legal aspects. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2018;178(1):123-27.
41. Gurschick L, Mayer DK, Hanson LC. Palliative sedation: An analysis of international guidelines and position statements. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2015;32(6):660-71.
42. Cassell EJ, Rich BA. Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation. Pain Medicine. 2010;11(3):435-38.
43. Treem J. Medical aid in dying: Ethical and practical issues. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology. 2023;14(3):207-11.
44. Padubidri JR, Antony Manoj M, Singh T. Euthanasia: A good death or an act of mercy killing? A global scenario. Clinical Ethics. 2022;17(2):118-21.
45. Callahan D. When self-determination runs amok. Hastings Center Report. 1992;22(2):52-5.
46. Crawley LM, Marshall PA, Lo B, Koenig BA. Strategies for culturally effective end-of-life care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;136(9):673-79.
47. Kagawa-Singer M, Blackhall LJ. Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: You got to go where he lives. JAMA. 2001;286(23):2993-3001.
48. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Curiale V, McCrone P, Higginson IJ. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;6(1):CD007760.
49. Buturovic Z. Embracing slippery slope on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia could have significant unintended consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2021;47(4):257-58.
50. Meier DE. The treatment of patients with unbearable suffering—the slippery slope is real. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2021;181(2):160-61.
51. Singer P. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
52. Chadwick A, Craig F. Withholding and withdrawing treatment in paediatric intensive care. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2024;34(2):69-73.
53. Gaul AL, Wilson SF. Should a ventilator be removed at a patient’s request? An ethical analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 1990;22(5):326-29.
54. Panayiotou P. Beneficence cannot justify voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2024;50(6):384-87.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adam Braus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.
_smaller.png){kind=logo}
