Science in Society: The Idoine Case for Interdisciplinary Dynamics that Promote Skills

Authors

  • Antoine Boudreau LeBlanc Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-0111
  • Josianne Barrette-Moran Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-6091
  • Georges-Philippe Gadoury-Sansfaçon Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-4160
  • Valentin Kravtchenko Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • Virginie Manus Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2045-881X
  • Sonya Anvar Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6466-2742

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7202/1124222ar

Keywords:

academic ethics, research funding, collaborative initiative, social innovation

Language(s):

French

Abstract

Research ethics has historically focused on the “laboratory researcher,” neglecting fundamental aspects of academic life, such as knowledge transfer, bibliometric dynamics, and structural inequalities. These issues profoundly influence academic trajectories, particularly in a context where interdisciplinarity and the breaking down of barriers between faculties have become academic and societal imperatives. This text explores a latent force present in academic institutions capable of transcending traditional divisions to promote better integration of skills, knowledge and practices, first within its institution, but also more broadly in society. We introduce the Idoine Collective as an organisational model for studying and experimenting with mechanisms that meet the needs of knowledge transfer, while investigating the institutional structures that hinder interdisciplinarity and the promotion of students’ and researchers’ skills. The Idoine Collective is considered as a subject of study in procedural ethics and governance, allowing us to analyse how alternative organisational frameworks can support science in action, break down barriers between disciplines and strengthen the link between universities and society. By examining these dynamics, this texte invites us to rethink the place of students and researchers in the production and dissemination of knowledge, while highlighting the structural tensions that remain in academia.

References

1. Resnik DB. Moral distress in scientific research. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2016;16(12):13-15.

2. Low BS, Koshy S, Thein KMM, Tayeba S & Saha S. Factors associated with sleep disorders among international university students in Malaysia. Sleep and Vigilance. 2024;8:1-8.

3. Carrion LL, Bramstedt KA. Academic integrity, moral courage, and whistleblowing in student research. In: Eaton SE, editor. Second Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. 2024.

4. Boudreau LeBlanc A. Global living ethics: unveiling practical and theoretical synergies through reflexive balancing. Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique. 2024;7(4):71-83.

5. Hallonsten O. Stop evaluating science: A historical-sociological argument. Social Science Information. 2021;60(1):7-26.

6. Canadian Association for Neuroscience. Science funding in Canada — Statistics.

7. Fond de recherche du Québec. Offres de financement 2024-2025.

8. Ganske KM. Moral distress in academia. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2010;15(3):6.

Published

2026-03-16

How to Cite

[1]
Boudreau LeBlanc A, Barrette-Moran J, Gadoury-Sansfaçon G-P, Kravtchenko V, Manus V, Anvar S. Science in Society: The Idoine Case for Interdisciplinary Dynamics that Promote Skills. Can. J. Bioeth 2026;9:192-7. https://doi.org/10.7202/1124222ar.

Issue

Section

Perspectives