Revisiting the Confucian Objections to Beauchamp and Childress’ Principle of Respect for Autonomy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7202/1126624ar

Keywords:

autonomy, Confucianism, family-based medical decision-making, specification

Language(s):

English

Abstract

A persistent Confucian critique of Beauchamp and Childress’ principle of respect for autonomy is that the principle exalts individual autonomy and ignores family-based medical decision-making. This article defends the principle by questioning its individualistic underpinnings and arguing that it is compatible with family-based medical decision-making through specification.

References

1. Gordon JS. Global ethics and principlism. Kenn Inst Ethics J. 2011;21(3):251-76.

2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics 7th ed. Oxford University Press; 2013.

3. Fan F. Confucian reflective equilibrium: why principlism is misleading for Chinese bioethical decision-making, As Bioethics Rev. 2012;4(1):4-13

4. Fan R. The Confucian bioethics of surrogate decision making: Its communitarian roots. Theor Med Bio. 2011;32(5):301-13.

5. Rauprich O. Common morality: comment on Beauchamp and Childress. Theor Med Bio. 2008;29(1):43-71.

6. Trotter G. The authority of the common morality. J. Med Phil. 2020;45(4-5):427-40.

7. Lee SC. Intimacy and family consent: a Confucian ideal, J Med Phil. 2015;40(4):418-36.

8. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics: marking its fortieth anniversary. Am J Bioethics. 2019;19(11):9-12.

9. Childress JF, Beauchamp TL. Common morality principles in biomedical ethics: responses to critics. Cam Quart Healthcare Ethics. 2022;31(2):172.

10. Meng M, Li X, Zhao J, Hao Y. When western concept meets eastern culture: Exploring the impact of Confucianism on shared decision-making in China. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024;11(11):100586.

11. Tsai DFC. How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(1):44-50.

12. Joseph R. A clinical view of Western or Eastern principles in a global bioethics, As Bioethics Rev. 2011;3(1):3-13.

13. Tan C, Neo R. Illustrating the contribution of Confucian philosophy through a reinterpretation of Beauchamp and Childress’ principle of respect for autonomy. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jun 7. doi:10.1007/s40592-025-00257-y. [Epub ahead of print]

14. Tan C, Neo R. Re-envisioning autonomy from a Confucian viewpoint. UniCath J Biomed Bioeth. 2025;2(2): 34-41.

© Han Han Li

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

[1]
Tan C, Neo R. Revisiting the Confucian Objections to Beauchamp and Childress’ Principle of Respect for Autonomy. Can. J. Bioeth 2026;9:111-4. https://doi.org/10.7202/1126624ar.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): Open Issue

Section

Critical commentaries

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Charlene Tan, Ruth Neo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.